Nebbelwerfer vs Katiushka

German weapons, vehicles and equipment 1919-1945.

Moderator: sniper1shot

User avatar
Teddy Wisch
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 4:58 am
Location: Spain

Nebbelwerfer vs Katiushka

Post by Teddy Wisch »

That's the question. Which one was better?
User avatar
Christian
Patron
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by Christian »

I would have to lean towards the truck mounted Katiusha as it could have as many as 48 launchers versus only 6 barrels for the Nebelwerfer. In addition, it was a much more mobile weapon system compared to the Nebelwerfer.

Regards,

Christian
User avatar
Das Reich
Supporter
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:11 am

Post by Das Reich »

I think the caliper of the rockets (if you can even describe rockets with calipers, I dunno) on the Katiusha was larger than that on the Nebelwerfer. In other words... the rockets were bigger.
User avatar
Jason Long
Contributor
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 4:27 pm

Nebelwerfer vs. Katyusha

Post by Jason Long »

Das Reich is wrong. The smallest German Nebelwerfer to enter wide-spread service was 15cm with the larger calibers being 21cm, 28cm and 32cm. The bulk of the Soviet rockets were either 132mm or 82mm with some 30cm ones as well.

The chief advantage of the smaller Soviet weapons was they were much more thorough in covering an area compared to the larger Geman weapons. And their much greater mobility.

Jason
User avatar
Das Reich
Supporter
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 9:11 am

Post by Das Reich »

Thanks for clearing things up!
User avatar
Matt L
Contributor
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Matt L »

One also has to take into account reloading- the Nebelwerfer, being a ground mount weapon, was very easy to reload, while I'd think that the high-mounted (on a truck) Katyusha wouldn't be nearly so easy.

Further, the Katyusha rockets were typical simple Soviet technology- not particularly reliable, accurate, etc.- the Nebelwerfer rockets were typical German technology- very reliable, and particularly effective.

I think the comparison also has to take into account the 'Stuka zu Fuß'- 32cm Nebelwerfer rockets mounted on a SPW halftrack- I'd say was rather more effective than a Katyusha. Mobile, armored and of good design. The rockets' transport 'crate' was also the launch platform, so firing and reloading was quite easy.

It's my understanding that the Katyusha HAD to be employed in fair numbers and to shoot a lot of rockets simply because it was so inaccurate and that the rockets weren't excessively reliable.

Matt
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate- "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily'' William of Ockham
User avatar
Christian
Patron
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by Christian »

Matt,

You are correct that the Katyusha was not that accurate, however I would question whether it was ever designed to be. Instead Russians used them for heavy area bombardment and this had great psychological impact on enemy forces. While the Nebelwerfer's accuracy was better, it was far from perfect.

You bring up a good point in respect to the loading of the weapon and I agree that this was an advantage of the Nebelwerfer. However, Nebelwerfer positions were easy to spot and thus an inviting target for enemy artillery and mobility was definitely inferior to the truck mounted Katyusha.

Regards,

Christian
User avatar
Matt L
Contributor
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Matt L »

Oh, indeed I agree the Katyusha was never intended to be anything more than an area-saturation weapon- that's partly what I meant about Soviet technology- mass over quality (or in this case, accuracy). Certainly the Nebelwerfer wasn't supremely accurate either, but that's a drawback inherent in a rotation-stabilized 'dumb' rocket. They were also area-saturation weapons, but were rather more accurate and thus effective.

As for being easy to locate, I'd think that the fairly compact size of a Nebelwerfer would make it fairly easy to move- not as quick to drive away as a Katyusha, to be sure, but it's certainly fairly easy. Granted the HUGE plume of smoke that make it aptly named, did probably advertise its position better than a billboard would have :D Actually, that's why I pointed out the SPW- a weapon system that's more reasonable to compare to the Katyusha is definitely superior.

I'd say that for psychological effect, the Katyusha wins out because of its inaccuracy, and the fact that it was fielded in such huge numbers, but for actual effect, the Nebelwerfer wins- its rockets were extremely devestating- even the concussion being lethal.

In equal numbers, I'd rather have the Nebelwerfer, but then I've always thought they were one of the COOLEST weapons the Wehrmacht had :D

Matt
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate- "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily'' William of Ockham
User avatar
gubra
New Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 3:17 am
Location: Norway

Post by gubra »

I have seen pictures of nebelwerfers mounted on halftracks so they at least have been as mobile as their soviet counterpart. But of course, it might have been just a small percentage of those compared to the towed version.

Gubra
User avatar
Matt L
Contributor
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Matt L »

Quite true Gubra- that's the 15cm Panzerwerfer 42 auf (SdKfz 4/1) Maultier- a half-track mounting a 15cm 10-tube Nebelwerfer on a rotating mount. It was actually superceded by the 15cm Panzerwerfer 42 (Zehnling) auf sWS- this vehicle had more ammunition storage capacity and better cross-country performance. Unfortunately, I have NO idea how many of either were produced, but the number probably wasn't particularly high.

Matt
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate- "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily'' William of Ockham
User avatar
DeBaer
Contributor
Posts: 365
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 6:11 am
Location: Westphalia, Germany
Contact:

Post by DeBaer »

well there are numbers for the Maultier mounted:
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/3620/sdkfz41.htm

and theres the total number of sws built:
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/3620/sws.htm

only 825 sws total, and it says that only a small number was fit with the nebelwerfer, so it would be around 40 or something i guess.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Sven
-
terras licet et undas obstruat at caelum certe patet
User avatar
Matt L
Contributor
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2003 5:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Matt L »

Thanks Sven- as I suspected, only a tiny number compared to the number of Katyusha built. Then again, the Katyusha was just a regular truck with a few rails added to the back... like something you'd see 'bodged' together on Junkyard Wars actually :D
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone.

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate- "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily'' William of Ockham
User avatar
Christian
Patron
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by Christian »

Like something you'd see 'bodged' together on Junkyard Wars actually
I have to agree with you on that one Matt!! :D

Cheers,

Christian
User avatar
Christian Ankerstjerne
Supporter
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 8:30 am
Location: The Kingdom of Denmark

Post by Christian Ankerstjerne »

Reloading a 15 cm Panzerwerfer 42 auf Sf.
Image
Image
User avatar
Christian
Patron
Posts: 1244
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 6:24 am

Post by Christian »

Christian,

Thanks for posting these pictures. It definitely highlights how easy it was to load the launchers.

Regards,

Christian
Post Reply