Panzerjäger-Abteilung 178 (78th Sturm)

German unit histories, lineages, OoBs, ToEs, commanders, fieldpost numbers, organization, etc.

Moderator: Tom Houlihan

Post Reply
User avatar
Panther Al
New Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:58 pm

Panzerjäger-Abteilung 178 (78th Sturm)

Post by Panther Al »

Might be a bit of a stretch to find this sort of info out, but with what sort of equipment, in line of SP AT assets, was this unit equiped with?

Building it up for a wargame, but want to make sure that I have its makeup correct.

Also, agian a stretch, but what is a Granatwerfer-Bataillon?
User avatar
donwhite
Contributor
Posts: 394
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:31 pm
Location: Australia

Granatewerfer

Post by donwhite »

Panther Al,

Granatwerfer Bataillon = Mortar Battalion.
Sombody else might be able to help you with the equipment of the Pz.Jag.Abt which might possibly very depending on the year ('42,'43,'44 etc) you are gaming!

Cheers
Martin Block
Enthusiast
Posts: 416
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 11:09 am

Pz.Jg.Abt. 178

Post by Martin Block »

When the former 78. Inf.Div. was reorganized into the 78. Sturm-Div. it's Pz.Jg.Abt. 178 was authorized to become a fully self-propelled anti-tank unit with Stab and 2 companies of 13 Pak-Sfl. each, and thus 26 Panzerjäger II für 7,5 cm Pak 40/20 (Sd.Kfz. 131) AKA 'Marder II' were delivered until mid May 1943. This seems to have been the only delivery the unit ever received, no replacements are recorded as far as I could establish. Despite being engaged in several major combat actions losses were remarkably low and by 1.6.1944 the Pz.Jg.Abt. 178 still had 19 Marder II available. This however changed dramatically just a few weeks later when the Russians launched their devastating offensive against the German H.Gr. Mitte and the 78. Sturm-Div. lost most of its men and all heavy equipment in just a few days.

When the division was rebuild as 78. Gren.-, Volks-Gren.-, Volks-Sturm-Div. in the summer and fall of 1944 the new Pz.Jg.Abt. 178 was authorized to have one Pak mot.Z. company, one Jagdpanzer company and one light Flak company. However it took until the end of January 1945 before 14 Jagdpz. 38 actually arrived.

Martin Block
Last edited by Martin Block on Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Panther Al
New Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:58 pm

Post by Panther Al »

Thanks a ton, thats what I was hoping to find out.
User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7234
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: Panzerjäger-Abteilung 178 (78th Sturm)

Post by tigre »

Hello to all :D; taking advantage of this..........................

Jagdpanzer 38(t) in the 78. Volks-Sturm-Division.

The Panzerjäger Abteilung 178 was destroyed near Orsha in June 1944. Reorganized on 25 September 1944 at Mielau taking StuG Abt. 1178 and Flak Company 178. The new Pz.Jg.Abt. 178 was authorized to have one Pak mot.Z. company, one Jagdpanzer company and one light Flak company. However, it was not until the end of January 1945 that 14 Jagdpanzer 38s actually arrived. This was the 2. Jagdpanzerkompanie/ Volks-Sturm panzerjägerabteilung 178.

Source: https://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gl ... n/78ID.htm
Die 78. Infanterie-und Sturm-Division 1938-1945.Eine Dokumentation in Bildern.
https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/ ... ect/zoom/9

Cheers. Raúl M 8).
Attachments
image011.jpg
image011.jpg (39.68 KiB) Viewed 423 times
image015.jpg
image015.jpg (31.19 KiB) Viewed 423 times
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7234
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: Panzerjäger-Abteilung 178 (78th Sturm)

Post by tigre »

Hello to all :D; more..........................

Jagdpanzer 38(t) in the 78. Volks-Sturm-Division.

Source: https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/ ... ect/zoom/9

Cheers. Raúl M 8).
Attachments
image006.jpg
image006.jpg (26.29 KiB) Viewed 279 times
image017.jpg
image017.jpg (29.38 KiB) Viewed 279 times
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
Post Reply