Hi Guys,
Does anyone have any speculation on what would have happened if the Weimar Republic had continued in place till 1938 or 1940?
Cheers,
John K
Weimar Republic
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:50 pm
- Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Weimar Republic
' Strip war of the mantle of its glories and excitement, and it will disclose a gibbering ghost of pain , grief, dissappointment and despair'
- Doktor Krollspell
- Patron
- Posts: 2474
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:57 am
- Location: Sweden
Re: Weimar Republic
Hello John!
A somewhat late answer to an interesting what-if question...
Given the politically, economically and socially unstable (at best!) condition of Weimar Germany in the 20'ies and early 30'ies, I think that one path of political action that a Weimar era Goverment would never (dare) to go down is the official denouncement of the Versailles treaty and the subsequent official rearmament of Germany, enlistment, the Luftwaffe etc. The other thing they would not (dare) to do was the agressive political action (by Hitler) when it came to the Saar, the re-militarization of the Rhineland, the Anschluss of Austria and the annexation of the Sudetenland/occupation of Czeckoslovakia and the Memel area.
So, Weimar Germany of the summer of 1939 would not, could not from a military as well as a politically point of view start to wage war and thus provoke the major european powers into a reprise run of WWI... Military much weaker than Nazi Germany in 1939, politically weaker than Nazi Germany in 1939 (not a bad alternative per se), smaller land land area and population than Nazi Germany in 1939 and as such a smaller industrial capacity...
At least that's my two cents...
Regards,
Krollspell
A somewhat late answer to an interesting what-if question...
Given the politically, economically and socially unstable (at best!) condition of Weimar Germany in the 20'ies and early 30'ies, I think that one path of political action that a Weimar era Goverment would never (dare) to go down is the official denouncement of the Versailles treaty and the subsequent official rearmament of Germany, enlistment, the Luftwaffe etc. The other thing they would not (dare) to do was the agressive political action (by Hitler) when it came to the Saar, the re-militarization of the Rhineland, the Anschluss of Austria and the annexation of the Sudetenland/occupation of Czeckoslovakia and the Memel area.
So, Weimar Germany of the summer of 1939 would not, could not from a military as well as a politically point of view start to wage war and thus provoke the major european powers into a reprise run of WWI... Military much weaker than Nazi Germany in 1939, politically weaker than Nazi Germany in 1939 (not a bad alternative per se), smaller land land area and population than Nazi Germany in 1939 and as such a smaller industrial capacity...
At least that's my two cents...
Regards,
Krollspell
"Wie es eigentlich gewesen ist"
Leopold von Ranke (1795-1886)
Leopold von Ranke (1795-1886)
-
- on "time out"
- Posts: 8055
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:54 am
Re: Weimar Republic
Hi Dr. K,
The problem with the Weimar Republic is that the complexion of its governments is not predictable. For example, it is entirely possible that the Communist Party might have come to power by a similar pseudo-constitutional route to the Nazis. Then again the Weimar Republic might have been run by social democrats, or liberals or conservatives. Each would have had different policies more or less compatible with those of different of Germany's neighbours and rivals. One thing is for sure, if any of the latter came to power, Germany would have been easier to live with for its neighbours.
The economic side of Versailles was already unravelling before Hitler came to power, so it is possible, even probable, that other aspects of it might have ceased to be bones of contention by the late 1930s.
Cheers,
Sid
The problem with the Weimar Republic is that the complexion of its governments is not predictable. For example, it is entirely possible that the Communist Party might have come to power by a similar pseudo-constitutional route to the Nazis. Then again the Weimar Republic might have been run by social democrats, or liberals or conservatives. Each would have had different policies more or less compatible with those of different of Germany's neighbours and rivals. One thing is for sure, if any of the latter came to power, Germany would have been easier to live with for its neighbours.
The economic side of Versailles was already unravelling before Hitler came to power, so it is possible, even probable, that other aspects of it might have ceased to be bones of contention by the late 1930s.
Cheers,
Sid
Re: Weimar Republic
Papen was a dilettante and an imposter, 30/6/34 should have included this upstart
Re: Weimar Republic
there seems to be a mindset with so called historians, locked in the past, Hitler freed the Vaterland from the chains of Versailles, historians please free youself from preconceived dogmas
Re: Weimar Republic
And then sent millions of compatriots to death.raimund.h wrote:Hitler freed the Vaterland from the chains of Versailles,
amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas
Re: Weimar Republic
Gustav Knoske appears to be ignored by the {historians} afficionados of Weimar, WARUM BITTE ? This guy brought the Freikorp into being, and so preserved the Reich from the OST
Re: Weimar Republic
it is well to remember that Hitler had no compatriots in WW11.though yes, perhaps Fuschl, in the trenches inWW,1